tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7162097299083486159.post2018211980488949291..comments2023-08-04T05:10:45.722-04:00Comments on Compliance Perspectives: Remote SDV/SDR: Alternatives to Redact/FaxUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7162097299083486159.post-2338658812489900272015-04-24T09:01:05.900-04:002015-04-24T09:01:05.900-04:00Thanks for your questions.
(1) Monitors and audit...Thanks for your questions.<br /><br />(1) Monitors and auditors are given controlled access to the secure shared server where they can view the PDFs. (2) I don't think standard Adobe has all the facilities that Lyn Goldsmith's team uses. It may fall short in the redaction/encryption function. Also, the team uses Adobe Pro to save Outlook email messages in electronic PDF form as part of their paperless document system. I think that feature is unique to Adobe Pro. (I didn't talk about that in the blog since I was focusing on source review only.) (3) Yes, encryption keys are supplied to the reviewers. Laure Meehanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11510987152521069625noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7162097299083486159.post-90143110520259660192015-04-24T08:51:40.694-04:002015-04-24T08:51:40.694-04:00What software might be needed by monitors and/or a...What software might be needed by monitors and/or auditors to access these documents? Will standard Adobe be sufficient? Will encryption keys be needed?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com